🔗 Share this article

I possess a few thoughts regarding the comments made by ESPN broadcaster a well-known announcer after the Serbian champion's victory over Taylor Fritz in the New York major quarter-finals. Look – the athlete represents American, the commentator is from the US – and athletic competitions often encourage nationalism. Some letdown was appropriate. Rather, Fowler brought up the ongoing absence of American men at grand slam tournaments: none of them had lifted a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the tournament.

We all enjoy a narrative, myself included. But really. Even if the American had beaten Djokovic for the first time, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the next round, whom Fritz has yet to beat in an competitive encounter. And if he’d someway gotten past that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, against whom Fritz had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the previous seven major titles (plus Alcaraz proceeded to thrash a fatigued Serbian in the subsequent match). He stated in post-match interviews after the loss that he in fact liked his draw, because it presented the opportunity to beat the top three players in the sport back-to-back. Fritz is well justified to aspire to the accomplishment; an competitor is meant to have faith in themselves. But going into that Djokovic last eight match who else in their right mind had the lack of American champions in mind?

Coco Gauff’s second serve the sole barrier standing in her way and sustained success

The American, 28, is ranked fourth in the world entering this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has secured his previous six matches over No 3 Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. It's likely he could claim that position for himself in the future. But it’s clear that at present, that’s as high as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a vast gap of ranking points away. His elite serve and powerful power on each forehand and reverse side are sufficiently enough to defeat the majority of opponents on the professional circuit. When facing the select few generational talents, however, he is often helpless. The past few seasons has witnessed the curious rise of lanky, towering players who can nevertheless move around with the alarming quickness and grace of much shorter players. He is six-foot-five and appears that way. His movement is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was controlling, and playing a drop shot against him is usually a reliable tactic. That acts as a pretty harsh restriction on his upside.

The American has achieved a several significant, unexpected improvements throughout his career. Early on of the decade, he was hovering around the bottom of the top 30. Two years later, he was approaching the top 10. The previous season, he suddenly surged to fourth place – and maintained the spot. But the subsequent step, competing against and defeating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and even a declining Serbian, is the highest of all. What could the commentator thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the continuing slump of US male players lifting grand slams when he had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply excessive and the appreciation for the difficulty of the challenge insufficient.

The American star achieved a personal best run to the Wimbledon semi-finals in the summer.

Fritz’s play in that exact last eight match ought to have been enough of an indication. Djokovic won in four rounds, a victory that only felt uncertain for brief periods towards the very end, when Fritz had saved a few match points and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the rallies, with Fritz earning numerous opportunities to break. But Djokovic saved service break opportunity after service break opportunity, prolonging the streak to the brink of agony. When he eventually did convert a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately produced a terrible game to drop serve again; Djokovic had drawn him into a battle secondary to the main contest and forced him to use excessive effort to win it. Down match points in the final game, Fritz’s first serve floated to heaven. He extended the match two times on his backup delivery, but finally committed two errors. It wasn’t a collapse, I didn’t think, just a consequence of having to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The match was quite ironclad proof that Fritz is not good enough to defeat any version of the Serbian, that lost to Alcaraz in the following match and did not especially appeared like he thought he could triumph. This is absolutely fine – Djokovic is the best player ever, and might not be at the peak of his physical powers now, but has developed enough knowledge and strategic intelligence to compensate for a significant portion of the drop-off. The issue is the individuals who were expecting the American to prevail, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was had not done anything that indicated he would.

Fritz is an asset to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a calm, thoughtful voice in media sessions, exceeding almost anyone on the ATP except for the Russian star, willing to not just say how he feels or the tactic he believed determined a contest, but clarify it. That he should bear the brunt of the blame for the United States not produce a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick seems unjust. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the rankings, perhaps they can divide that load.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Group

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Division

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably dwell on it forever if I don’t accomplish it,” the American told an interviewer in June of claiming a grand slam. It is hoped he understands that he’s not a failure if he does not fulfill that objective, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s young, terrifying reign is actually highly improbable for all other players. {