The Rising ‘Posh-Poor Divide’: The Way Affluence and Deprivation Now Sit Cheek by Jowl in Across England.
In Nunsthorpe, inhabitants live in homes only several yards from their more affluent neighbours in nearby Scartho. One 1.8-metre-high barricade literally divides the two areas in Grimsby, Lincolnshire, blocking off paths and streets that previously linked them.
“It’s the posh-poor divide,” said a resident, 37. “It’s been like this for as long as I’ve known. I don’t think they’ll take it down because I suspect they’ll want to mix with us.”
An Increasingly Common National Picture
Data from official figures shows the extent of disparity can run, at times across nothing more than a short distance of asphalt, a hedge row or a barrier. Years of austerity and lack of funding have led to a situation where a majority of councils now have a locality ranking as one of the most deprived in the nation.
The spread of deprivation has led to a sharp rise in the number of places where disadvantaged and affluent people end up living side by side. Just a few years ago, just 65 of the poorest neighbourhoods adjoined one of the least deprived. This number rose to 119 in the most recent data.
A Barrier Which Does More Than Separate Space
In Grimsby, the divide is the most pronounced in the country and painfully obvious. The wall is much more than a metaphorical divide; it causes tangible difficulties for everyday life.
- School runs that should take 15-20 minutes turn into an sixty-minute detour.
- Access to key services like grocery stores, educational facilities and care homes is hindered.
- The area often sees vandalism and loitering, with reports of rubbish being dumped over the wall and other issues.
“You try to maintain a nice house and nice garden, and then you live opposite that,” noted one local, motioning at the rusted metal wall.
Local Bonds Against a Backdrop of Hardship
At Centre4, workers stress that support does not recognise addresses. “Your postcode is not a reliable indicator of your level of challenge,” said director Tracey Good.
Regardless of ranking in the lowest 10% for multiple deprivation indicators, the estate retains a fierce loyalty and feeling of togetherness among its inhabitants. By contrast, Scartho is classified among the most prosperous 10% nationally.
Echoes Elsewhere: An Estate in Kent
This phenomenon is repeated nationally. The Stanhope estate in Ashford, Kent, a 1960s overspill estate, is in the most disadvantaged tenth of areas in the country. It is closely bordered by spacious houses built in the early 2000s that are in the top 10% for job prospects and quality of surroundings.
“They may possess bigger houses, but here there’s more community,” commented a long-term resident, aged 63. “It’s likely many people in the new builds never even talk to each other.”
The financial gap is clear: an typical three-bedroom house sells for about £275,000 on the Stanhope estate, while across the divide comparable homes fetch about £410,000.
Residents describe a palpable sense of neglect. “Our neighbourhood is neglected,” said holistic health worker Susan Riley-Nevers. “In this area our facilities have gradually disappeared, and most of the community problems here are to do with poverty.”
The rise in these ‘deprivation divides’ paints a portrait of an ever more divided England, where wealth and deprivation are often awkwardly in close proximity.